Fence not only option for St. John’s harbour: Cleary
St. John`s – St. John’s
South-Mount Pearl MP Ryan Cleary says the proposed permanent fence around much
of the St. John’s harbour apron is not the only option — the port authority
could re-instate port security officers. Transport Canada requires the
port authority to increase security measures at St. John’s harbour, but government officials haven't directed the port authority on exactly how to do so.
“I have been trying to learn for weeks what the other security options
are besides a permanent fence,” says Cleary, whose riding takes in the port of
St. John’s. “Today we find out that there is another option that the public wasn't aware of.”
During a conference call Tuesday morning, Cleary says St. John’s Port
Authority CEO Sean Hanrahan admitted that fencing a portion of St. John’s harbour
and limiting public access is not the only option — Transport Canada’s
requirement for heightened security could also be satisfied by hiring port
security officers.
“Port security existed at St. John’s harbour until the mid to late 1990s
when they were eliminated,” says Cleary. “The public should have been made
aware of the other option right from the start. If security officers worked in
the past, they can work again, and both options need to be fully explored before
a final decision is made.”
Cleary is calling on the St. John’s Port Authority to release the cost
comparisons for both options.
“The public has a right to see the detailed analysis of the costs of both
fencing and port security as well as any other options considered in the back
rooms at the St. John’s Port Authority,” says Cleary. “I look forward to
increased public dialogue following this full disclosure.”
There have been calls in recent weeks for increased public consultation
and engagement on the harbour-fence issue, including a call from Cleary and
Jack Harris (St. John’s East) in December. As recently as last night, a motion
calling for a public consultation was defeated by St. John’s City Council.
Comments